8th November - 1st December 2012Opening: 8th November 2012Douglas Abercrombie; new paintings: |
Douglas Abercrombie; new paintings: Peter Hide; new sculptures
Density
of Relation. It is
Cézanne’s feeling that determined the form of his pictorial structure. It is
his pictorial structure that gives off his feeling. If all his pictorial
structures were to disappear from the world, so would a certain feeling. Robert Motherwell, Beyond
the Aesthetic, 1946 In this exhibition are
paintings by Douglas Abercrombie and sculptures by Peter Hide, all made during
the last two years. Linked by scale, success, abstraction and the use of the
cubic or the rectilinear, both sets of work also belong within traditions of
abstract art that are, at the very least, well established. The areas of colour
Abercrombie arrays across his pictures are involved with those of, amongst
others, Nicolas de Staël or Hans Hofmann; the sculptures Hide shows here, one
of which is loosely based on classical Hindu sculpture, extend the sculptural
languages established by Picasso, González,
Smith and Caro. Beyond what could be
described as their lateness, the work of both artists embodies a distinct relation
to time. Abercrombie’s pictures imply something like a coming into being or
show us a present that is open and luxurious, transient and fragile; Hide’s
sculptures establish a withdrawal that is both stubborn and refined, suggesting
a standing-against, an involvement in long duration. This formulation may be a
little ‘tricksy’, reaching for ‘meaning’ in a way which does a disservice to
their abstraction, putting far too tight a limit on the resonances that their
work has; but perhaps it is in part this relation to time which ensures their
work is much more than just a skillful working within already existing visual
languages. Though their means are almost exclusively formal, form is not
employed for its own sake, and what is compelling about the work is the depth
and clarity with which their structures can express feeling. The paintings by
Abercrombie are all basically rectilinear. They all imply a grid but are not
restricted by this, or at least the restrictions do not become oppressive.
Partly this can be explained by his feel for colour and his ability to make it
work spatially. Rather than flattening space, his grids seem to exist in space,
permeated by it. His colour choices are often surprising. He has
a predilection for the artificial hues that, as it were, come naturally to the
acrylic paint he has used for most of his career. But this artificiality does
not preclude a sensual richness and can generate naturalistic effects with
seeming ease. We can see a real delight in the way he uses colour to create
shifts in scale, and in how his structures move effortlessly from light to dark
and back again. Though at times they contain glimpses of large vistas or
infinite horizons, there is an intimacy which is a feature even of his larger
works. It is a quality which perhaps explains why I have been reminded of his
painting whilst looking at Italian Primitive panels in the National and or at
Pieter de Hooch’s two small paintings in the Wallace Collection. Intimacy sits
strangely in the work of a painter strongly influenced by the self-aggrandising
statements of Abstract Expressionism and it is likely that an understanding of
Abercrombie’s originality - the particular feeling his structures contain -
would need to consider this seeming contradiction. As important as his use of colour, and really
inseparable from it, is the way Abercrombie handles paint. The range and
spontaneity of his touch - free but never unrestrainedly gestural - means that
for him a grid, or any format, is not something unthinkingly repeated and
imposed on each painting, after which the real work can begin. Instead it is as
if a format exists prior to each painting as a set of potential elements or,
better, a flexible set of coordinates, which can give and stretch in all manner
of ways whilst retaining their basic identity. What matters is how the whole is
knitted together; how each bar, expanse, dash or dot of colour comes together
and creates a particular set of relations. That Abercrombie is able to push format
painting past its limitations partly explains why pictures that may have felt
familiar more than four decades ago can seem so fresh, so newly created. The
excitement of looking at them is in part one of seeing the different ways he
can move past format: how a structural column becomes a void; or how one panel
moves beyond its confines and threatens to erase the rest of the
painting. Throughout his career, certainly since he moved away from
‘hard-edge’ in the early seventies, this formal ability has often been
accompanied by an evocation of time - slowly passing, caught in a flash
or in abeyance - which a restricted formalism struggles to describe. Colour
smoulders or glimmers in his paintings; it can emerge from the edge of a
brushstroke as light passes through a crack in an opening door. At times there
is a sense of revelation, as if his structures were on the edge of shedding off
inchoateness. Perhaps the attraction of his painting is how he is able to
contain these intimations (overblown when written down) in structures that
remain crafted, expedient and matter-of-fact. In notes to the sculptures in this exhibition
Hide writes they ‘are based on the idea of containment’. I think we could
extend this to say that this containment, and the boundaries it involves,
exists between contraction and expansion; and that this opposition goes hand in
hand with the sculptures’ defensive stance. In a narrow and restrictedly ‘Art’
sense it could be said it is ‘Sculpture’ that is being defended, involving a
desire to return to sculpture some of the formal values which Hide, and others
of his generation, thought had been lost in the spatially open constructions of
the sixties, from which their work had sprung, and to which it still returns,
in both a spirit of continuation and contestation. In a broader and more
interesting sense, containment and defense become part of the sculptures’
deeper content, the particular feeling which their formal relations establish
in the world. Sculpture as an entwining of defense and
containment has long been a theme in Hide’s art. At first in was related to a
minimalist division of space, limited and materialist; then in sculptures like Advance,
1975, it began to take on wider, and perhaps too quickly reached, symbolic
connotations. It receives its longest running exposition in the series of
upright sculptures which form the backbone of his work, first hinted at in some
of his structural literalist sculpture of the late sixties, before beginning to
fully emerge in sculptures such as Zenith, 1975. Hide suggests his 1975
sculpture Pomeroy, in orientation like a cube with two of its opposing
sides removed, is one of the first to explore the particular expression of
containment found in the works in the current exhibition; that is, without the
symbolic connotations of uprightness. Hide sees Pomeroy as rooted in an
‘intense experience of landscape when I lay on my stomach and looked over the
edge of a precipice into the cube-like space of a contained little valley, here
and there dotted with trees, a landscape in a box, or perhaps forms threatening
to burst out of a box’ What is telling about Hide’s description is the
way that the body – physical more than upright - is integrated with the
normally opposed scales of landscape and with still-life. The density of this
integration and the way it works in a sense in spite of the elements of which
it comprises is central to Hide’s sculptures. More important than the
simple existence of resemblance is the feel of the relations of which the
sculptures comprise; or rather what matters is the extent to which any
resemblances they may have are filtered - forced might be more accurate - through
the sculptures’ formal relations. There is a sense of the elements existing as
solid masses; here we can see why Hide considers himself a carver as much as a
constructor. Though at root still an art of arrangement, crucial to Hide’s
sculpture is that structure is forced through material, felt within each
individual element, not just in the relations between them. It is in this
forcing and melding together that the temporal aspect of Hide’s work
originates; it is what gives his work its feeling of endurance and of
defensiveness, its astringency and its ill-at-ease elegance. Sam Cornish September 2012 |